Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2023

Video-based marker-free tracking and multi-scale analysis of mouse locomotor activity and behavioral aspects in an open field arena: A perspective approach to the quantification of complex gait disturbances associated with Alzheimer's disease.

Mikhail Bogachev, Aleksandr Sinitca, Konstantin Grigarevichius, Nikita Pyko, Asya Lyanova, Margarita Tsygankova, Eldar Davletshin, Konstantin Petrov, Tatyana Ageeva, Svetlana Pyko and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mikhail BogachevCentre for Digital Telecommunication Technologies, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, Russia.
Aleksandr SinitcaCentre for Digital Telecommunication Technologies, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, Russia.
Konstantin GrigarevichiusCentre for Digital Telecommunication Technologies, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, Russia.
Nikita PykoCentre for Digital Telecommunication Technologies, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, Russia.
Asya LyanovaCentre for Digital Telecommunication Technologies, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, Russia.
Margarita TsygankovaCentre for Digital Telecommunication Technologies, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, Russia.
Eldar DavletshinInstitute for Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Konstantin PetrovFRC Kazan Scientific Center of RAS, Arbuzov Institute of Organic and Physical Chemistry, Kazan, Russia.
Tatyana AgeevaInstitute for Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Svetlana PykoCentre for Digital Telecommunication Technologies, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, Russia.
Dmitrii KaplunCentre for Digital Telecommunication Technologies, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", St. Petersburg, Russia.
Airat KayumovInstitute for Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Yana MukhamedshinaInstitute for Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.
Saint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University · RUKazan Federal University · RUKazan Scientific Center · RUKazan State Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Complex gait disturbances represent one of the prominent manifestations of various neurophysiological conditions, including widespread neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Therefore, instrumental measurement techniques and automatic computerized analysis appears essential for the differential diagnostics, as well as for the assessment of treatment effectiveness from experimental animal models to clinical settings. Methods: Here we present a marker-free instrumental approach to the analysis of gait disturbances in animal models. Our approach is based on the analysis of video recordings obtained with a camera placed underneath an open field arena with transparent floor using the DeeperCut algorithm capable of online tracking of individual animal body parts, such as the snout, the paws and the tail. The extracted trajectories of animal body parts are next analyzed using an original computerized methodology that relies upon a generalized scalable model based on fractional Brownian motion with parameters identified by detrended partial cross-correlation analysis. Results: We have shown that in a mouse model representative movement patterns are characterized by two asymptotic regimes characterized by integrated 1/f noise at small scales and nearly random displacements at large scales separated by a single crossover. More detailed analysis of gait disturbances revealed that the detrended cross-correlations between the movements of the snout, paws and tail relative to the animal body midpoint exhibit statistically significant discrepancies in the Alzheimer's disease mouse model compared to the control group at scales around the location of the crossover. Discussion: We expect that the proposed approach, due to its universality, robustness and clear physical interpretation, is a promising direction for the design of applied analysis tools for the diagnostics of various gait disturbances and behavioral aspects in animal models. We further believe that the suggested mathematical models could be relevant as a complementary tool in clinical diagnostics of various neurophysiological conditions associated with movement disorders.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseanimal behavior analysisDeepLabCutdetrended partial cross-correlation analysis (DPCCA)fluctuation functionsgait disturbanceopen field-testvideo analysis

Identifiers

PMID36817970
PMCPMC9932053
OpenAlexW4319034911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.