Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817959›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Machine learning in computational modelling of membrane protein sequences and structures: From methodologies to applications.

Jianfeng Sun, Arulsamy Kulandaisamy, Jacklyn Liu, Kai Hu, M Michael Gromiha, Yuan Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianfeng SunBotnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
Arulsamy KulandaisamyDepartment of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of BioSciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, Tamilnadu, India.
Jacklyn LiuUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Kai HuKey Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Information Processing of Ministry of Education, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China.
M Michael GromihaDepartment of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of BioSciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, Tamilnadu, India.
Yuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Information Processing of Ministry of Education, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane proteins mediate a wide spectrum of biological processes, such as signal transduction and cell communication. Due to the arduous and costly nature inherent to the experimental process, membrane proteins have long been devoid of well-resolved atomic-level tertiary structures and, consequently, the understanding of their functional roles underlying a multitude of life activities has been hampered. Currently, computational tools dedicated to furthering the structure-function understanding are primarily focused on utilizing intelligent algorithms to address a variety of site-wise prediction problems (e.g., topology and interaction sites), but are scattered across different computing sources. Moreover, the recent advent of deep learning techniques has immensely expedited the development of computational tools for membrane protein-related prediction problems. Given the growing number of applications optimized particularly by manifold deep neural networks, we herein provide a review on the current status of computational strategies mainly in membrane protein type classification, topology identification, interaction site detection, and pathogenic effect prediction. Meanwhile, we provide an overview of how the entire prediction process proceeds, including database collection, data pre-processing, feature extraction, and method selection. This review is expected to be useful for developing more extendable computational tools specific to membrane proteins.

Indexed as

DatabasesDiseasesInteraction sitesMachine learningMembrane proteinsMutationsPrediction tools

Identifiers

PMID36817959
PMCPMC9932300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.