ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2022
Detection of autism spectrum disorder using graph representation learning algorithms and deep neural network, based on fMRI signals.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- NeuroCypher ASD: Machine Learning with Knowledge Graph-Based Representation for ASD Screening in Toddlers.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2026Article
- Identifying Diagnostic Biomarkers for Autism Spectrum Disorder From Higher-order Interactions Using the PED Algorithm.Neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- An Umbrella Review of the Fusion of fMRI and AI in Autism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- From brain scans to classifiers: A systematic review of ML-based autism diagnostic frameworks.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Can we apply graph representation learning algorithms to identify autism spectrum disorder (ASD) patients within a large brain imaging dataset? ASD is mainly identified by brain functional connectivity patterns. Attempts to unveil the common neural patterns emerged in ASD are the essence of ASD classification. We claim that graph representation learning methods can appropriately extract the connectivity patterns of the brain, in such a way that the method can be generalized to every recording condition, and phenotypical information of subjects. These methods can capture the whole structure of the brain, both local and global properties. Methods: The investigation is done for the worldwide brain imaging multi-site database known as ABIDE I and II (Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange). Among different graph representation techniques, we used AWE, Node2vec, Struct2vec, multi node2vec, and Graph2Img. The best approach was Graph2Img, in which after extracting the feature vectors representative of the brain nodes, the PCA algorithm is applied to the matrix of feature vectors. The classifier adapted to the features embedded in graphs is an LeNet deep neural network. Results and discussion: Although we could not outperform the previous accuracy of 10-fold cross-validation in the identification of ASD versus control patients in this dataset, for leave-one-site-out cross-validation, we could obtain better results (our accuracy: 80%). The result is that graph embedding methods can prepare the connectivity matrix more suitable for applying to a deep network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.