Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817922›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Design and psychometric properties of the family support for older people questionnaire.

Soheila Shamsikhani, Fazlollah Ahmadi, Anoshirvan Kazemnejad, Mojtaba Vaismoradi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Soheila ShamsikhaniShazand School of Nursing, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Fazlollah AhmadiNursing Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Anoshirvan KazemnejadBiostatistical Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba VaismoradiFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Tarbiat Modares University · IRCharles Sturt University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: The population of older people is increasing across the world. Older people need care and support from their families to be able to live independently. This study aimed to design and evaluate the psychometric properties of the family support for older people (FSOP) questionnaire. Methods: In this instrument development study using a mixed-methods design, the psychometric properties of the FSOP questionnaire in terms of validity and reliability were evaluated. Results: The FSOP questionnaire consisted of 50 items in six domains. It was shown to have appropriate qualitative and quantitative validities (score > 1.5). The indicators of content validity (CVR > 0.62, ICVI ≥ 0.80, and SCVI > 0.94) and confirmatory factor analysis (indexes of χ Conclusions: Healthcare providers and family caregivers are suggested to use the FSOP questionnaire for improving the quality of life of older people at home.

Indexed as

Family SupportQuality of LifeAgedHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesfactor analysisfamily supporthome careolder peoplepsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID36817922
PMCPMC9932903
OpenAlexW4318987998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.