Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817874›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Towards modern post-coma care based on neuroscientific evidence.

Leandro R D Sanz, Steven Laureys, Olivia Gosseries

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07077135 (Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation to Treat Disorders of Consciousness), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07077135 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation to Treat Disorders of Consciousness

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei TintoriRan2025 to 2028Enrolled106ConditionsDisorder of ConsciousnessArmsstimulated group, Sham (No Treatment)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Toward a common clinical lexicon of consciousness.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. The experimental study of consciousness: Is psychology travelling back to the future?International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leandro R D SanzComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Steven LaureysComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Olivia GosseriesComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Understanding the mechanisms underlying human consciousness is pivotal to improve the prognostication and treatment of severely brain-injured patients. Consciousness remains an elusive concept and the identification of its neural correlates is an active subject of research, however recent neuroscientific advances have allowed scientists to better characterize disorders of consciousness. These breakthroughs question the historical nomenclature and our current management of post-comatose patients. Method: This review examines the contribution of consciousness neurosciences to the current clinical management of severe brain injury. It investigates the major impact of consciousness disorders on healthcare systems, the scientific frameworks employed to identify their neural correlates and how evidence-based data from neuroimaging research have reshaped the landscape of post-coma care in recent years. Results: Our increased ability to detect behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of consciousness has led to significant changes in taxonomy and clinical practice. We advocate for a multimodal framework for the management of severely brain-injured patients based on precision medicine and evidence-based decisions, integrating epidemiology, health economics and neuroethics. Conclusions: Major progress in brain imaging and clinical assessment have opened the door to a new era of post-coma care based on standardized neuroscientific evidence. We highlight its implications in clinical applications and call for improved collaborations between researchers and clinicians to better translate findings to the bedside.

Indexed as

ComaCRS-R, Coma Recovery Scale - RevisedDisorders of ConsciousnessDoC, Disorders of ConsciousnessEEG, ElectroencephalographyfMRI, Functional Magnetic Resonance ImagingMCS, Minimally Conscious StateMinimally Conscious StateNeuroimagingPET, Positron Emission TomographySECONDs, Short Evaluation of Consciousness DisordersUnresponsive Wakefulness SyndromeUWS, Unresponsive Wakefulness SyndromeVS, Vegetative State

Identifiers

PMID36817874
PMCPMC9932483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.