Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817681›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2023

Time-dependent effects of cellulose and gelatin-based hemostats on cellular processes of wound healing.

Markus U Wagenhäuser, Waseem Garabet, Mia van Bonn, Wiebke Ibing, Joscha Mulorz, Yae Hyun Rhee, Joshua M Spin, Christos Dimopoulos, Alexander Oberhuber, Hubert Schelzig and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness and Safety of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose for Hemostasis in Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Markus U WagenhäuserDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Waseem GarabetDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mia van BonnDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wiebke IbingDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Joscha MulorzDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Yae Hyun RheeDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Joshua M SpinStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Christos DimopoulosDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Alexander OberhuberDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hubert SchelzigDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Florian SimonDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Oxidized regenerated cellulose-based (ORC - TABOTAMP), oxidized non-regenerated cellulose-based (ONRC - RESORBA CELL), and gelatin-based (GELA - GELITA TUFT-IT) hemostats are commonly used in surgery. However, their impact on the wound healing process remains largely unexplored. We here assess time-dependent effects of exposure to these hemostats on fibroblast-related wound healing processes. Material and methods: Hemostats were applied to fibroblast cell cultures for 5-10 (short-), 30 and 60 min (intermediate-) and 24 h (long-term). Representative images of the hemostat degradation process were obtained, and the pH value was measured. Cell viability, apoptosis and migration were analyzed after the above exposure times at 3, 6 and 24 h follow-up. Protein levels for tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and transforming-growth factor β (TGF-β) were assessed. Results: ORC and ONRC reduced pH values during degradation, while GELA proved to be pH-neutral. Hemostat structural integrity was prolonged for GELA (vs. ORC and ONRC). TGF-β and TNF-α levels were reduced for ORC and ONRC (vs. GELA and control) ( Conclusions: Short-term exposure to ORC and ONRC impairs relevant wound healing-related processes in fibroblasts, and alters protein levels of key mediating cytokines. GELA does not show similar effects. We conclude that GELA may be preferred over ORC and ONRC over short-, intermediate- and long-term exposures. Future validation of the clinical relevance is warranted.

Indexed as

cell migrationcell proliferationcellulosecytokineexposurefibroblastgelatinhemostatswound healing

Identifiers

PMID36817681
PMCPMC9897096
OpenAlexW3006727398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.