Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817677›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2023

Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin bridging enoxaparin versus fondaparinux in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: evidence from a single-center study.

Yanqing Guo, Jingping Wang, Zhixin Wang, Li Li, Jian An

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanqing GuoDepartment of Cardiology, Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Jingping WangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Zhixin WangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Li LiDepartment of Cardiology, Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Jian AnDepartment of Cardiology, Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin bridging enoxaparin versus fondaparinux in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: The study is a prospective, natural, and selective interventional trial based on real-world data for 482 AMI patients. Results: At the end of the follow-up, the two groups demonstrated similar major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and bleeding rates. After propensity score matching (PSM), the fondaparinux group showed greater advantages in reducing MACCE and bleeding events. Conclusions: The anticoagulation strategy of bivalirudin bridging fondaparinux seems to be superior to that of bivalirudin bridging enoxaparin in patients with AMI undergoing PPCI.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionbivalirudinenoxaparinfondaparinuxprimary percutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID36817677
PMCPMC9897106
OpenAlexW4316466243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.