Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817635›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of educational technology in higher education2023

The Triple-S framework: ensuring scalable, sustainable, and serviceable practices in educational technology.

Christian Moro, Kathy A Mills, Charlotte Phelps, James Birt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of educational technology in higher education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian MoroFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226 Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2190-8301
Kathy A MillsInstitute for Learning Sciences and Teacher Education, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1140-3545
Charlotte PhelpsFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4217-0214
James BirtFaculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0422-4867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Educational institutions are increasingly investing into digital delivery, acquiring new devices, and employing novel software and services. The rising costs associated with maintenance, in combination with increasing redundancy of older technologies, presents multiple challenges. While lesson content itself may not have changed, the educational landscape constantly evolves, where tertiary institutions are incorporating new modes of content delivery, hybrid-style learning, and interactive technologies. Investments into digital expansions must be taken with caution, particularly prior to the procurement of technology, with a need for the proposed interventions' scalability, sustainability, and serviceability to be considered. This article presents the Triple-S framework for educators, administrators, and educational institutions, and outlines examples of its application within curricula. The paper synthesises research evidence to provide the foundation underlying the key principles of the Triple-S framework, presenting a useful model to use when evaluating digital interventions. Utilising the framework for decisions regarding the acquisition of educational technology, devices, software, applications, and online resources can assist in the assurance of viable and  appropriate investments. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

Blended learninge-learningSustainabilityTechnology-enhanced learningTertiary education

Identifiers

PMID36817635
PMCPMC9922542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.