Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817503›Full record

ReviewWestern Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR

Ready to respond: adapting rapid response team training in Papua New Guinea during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Celeste Marsh, Sharon Salmon, Tambri Housen, James Flint, Joanne Taylor, Emmanuel Hapolo, Maria Trinidad Velasco Ortuzar, Bernnedine Sissai Smaghi, Anthony Eshofonie, Berry Ropa

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Celeste MarshUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Sharon SalmonGlobal Outbreak Alert and Response Network, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tambri HousenUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
James FlintUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Joanne TaylorUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Emmanuel HapoloSurveillance and Emergency Response Unit, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Maria Trinidad Velasco OrtuzarUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Bernnedine Sissai SmaghiSurveillance and Emergency Response Unit, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
Anthony EshofonieWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
Berry RopaSurveillance and Emergency Response Unit, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
National Department of Health · PGUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUWorld Health Organization · CHWorld University of Bangladesh · BD

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problem: Rapid response teams (RRTs) are critical for effective responses to acute public health events. While validated training packages and guidance on rolling out training for RRTs are available, they lack country-specific adaptations. Documentation is limited on RRT programming experiences in various contexts. Context: In Papua New Guinea, there remain gaps in implementing standardized, rapid mobilization of multidisciplinary RRTs at the national, provincial and district levels to investigate public health alerts. Action: The human resources needed to respond to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic forced a review of the RRT training programme and its delivery. The training model was contextualized and adapted for implementation using a staged approach, with the initiation training phase designed to ensure RRT readiness to deploy immediately in response to COVID-19 and other public health events. Lessons learned: Selecting appropriate trainees and using a phased training approach, incorporating after-training reviews, and between-phase support from the national programme team were found to be important for programme design in Papua New Guinea. Using participatory training methods based on principles of adult learning, in which trainees draw on their own experiences, was integral to building confidence among team members in conducting outbreak investigations. Discussion: The RRT training experience in Papua New Guinea has highlighted the importance of codeveloping and delivering a context-specific training programme to meet a country's unique needs. A staged training approach that builds on knowledge and skills over time, used together with ongoing follow-up and support in the provinces, has been critical in operationalizing ready-to-respond RRTs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hospital Rapid Response TeamAdultDisease OutbreaksHumansPandemicsPapua New Guinea

Identifiers

PMID36817503
PMCPMC9912294
OpenAlexW4320059845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.