Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817456›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2023

Switch to ocrelizumab in MS patients treated with natalizumab in extended interval dosing at high risk of PML: A 96-week follow-up pilot study.

Pilar Santiago-Setien, Cristina Barquín-Rego, Paula Hernández-Martínez, María Ezquerra-Marigomez, Marta Torres-Barquin, Cristina Menéndez-Garcia, Fernando Uriarte, Yésica Jiménez-López, Mercedes Misiego, Jose Ramón Sánchez de la Torre and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pilar Santiago-SetienService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-Institute of Research Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Torrelavega, Spain.
Cristina Barquín-RegoService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-Institute of Research Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Torrelavega, Spain.
Paula Hernández-MartínezService of Internal Medicine, Hospital Sierrallana-IDIVAL, Torrelavega, Spain.
María Ezquerra-MarigomezService of Internal Medicine, Hospital Sierrallana-IDIVAL, Torrelavega, Spain.
Marta Torres-BarquinService of Radiology, Hospital Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Spain.
Cristina Menéndez-GarciaService of Radiology, Hospital Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Spain.
Fernando UriarteService of Pharmacy, Hospital Sierrallana, Torrelavega, Spain.
Yésica Jiménez-LópezService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-Institute of Research Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Torrelavega, Spain.
Mercedes MisiegoService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-Institute of Research Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Torrelavega, Spain.
Jose Ramón Sánchez de la TorreService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-Institute of Research Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Torrelavega, Spain.
Sonia SetienService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-Institute of Research Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Torrelavega, Spain.
Manuel Delgado-AlvaradoService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-Institute of Research Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Torrelavega, Spain.
Javier RianchoService of Neurology, Hospital Sierrallana-Institute of Research Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Torrelavega, Spain.
Hospital Sierrallana · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of ocrelizumab in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) at high risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), previously treated with natalizumab in extending interval dosing (EID), who switched to ocrelizumab and to compare them with patients who continued EID-natalizumab. Thirty MS patients previously treated with natalizumab in EID (every 8 weeks) were included in this observational retrospective cohort study. Among them, 17 patients were switched to ocrelizumab and 13 continued with EID-natalizumab. Except for the John Cunningham virus (JCV) index, no significant differences were detected between both groups. Main outcome measures included: annualized relapse rate (ARR), radiological activity, disability progression, and the NEDA-3 index. Patients were followed for 96 weeks. The median washout period in ocrelizumab-switchers was 6 weeks. Among them, AAR and radiological activity during follow-up were 0.03, without significant differences in comparison with the previous period on natalizumab-EID. The comparison between ocrelizumab-switchers and patients continuing on EID-natalizumab showed no significant differences in AAR, radiological activity, or disability progression. However, the proportion of patients maintaining a NEDA-3 status in week 96 was slightly superior among ocrelizumab-switchers (94 vs 69%). No serious adverse events were observed in any group. In conclusion, switching from EID-natalizumab to ocrelizumab can be considered as a therapeutic option, particularly in patients with MS at high risk of PML, to mitigate the risks of both PML and disease reactivation.

Indexed as

Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive MultifocalMultiple SclerosisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunologic FactorsNatalizumabPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunologic FactorsNatalizumabocrelizumabextended interval dosingmultiple sclerosisnatalizumabocrelizumabPML - progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Identifiers

PMID36817456
PMCPMC9929864
OpenAlexW4318831377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.