Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817401›Full record

ArticleCentral-European journal of immunology2022

Implementation of TREC/KREC detection protocol for newborn SCID screening in Bulgaria: a pilot study.

Marina Marinova, Atanaska Georgyeva, Viktoriya Yordanova, Nedelcho Ivanov, Valentina Atanasova, Elissaveta Naumova, Snezhina Mihailova Kandilarova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central-European journal of immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transient B cell lymphopenia revealed by KRECs newborn screening: Post-screening referral strategies, clinical course, and follow-up.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marina MarinovaDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Medical University Sofia, Bulgaria.
Atanaska GeorgyevaClinic of Clinical Immunology with Stem Cell Bank, Alexandrovska University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Viktoriya YordanovaNational Genetics Laboratory, University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology "Maichin dom", Medical University Sofia, Bulgaria.
Nedelcho IvanovClinic of Clinical Immunology with Stem Cell Bank, Alexandrovska University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Valentina AtanasovaClinic of Clinical Immunology with Stem Cell Bank, Alexandrovska University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Elissaveta NaumovaDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Medical University Sofia, Bulgaria.
Snezhina Mihailova KandilarovaDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Medical University Sofia, Bulgaria.
Alexandrovska Hospital · BGMaichin Dom · BGMedical University of Sofia · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal screening for inborn errors of immunity (IEI), based on quantification of T-cell-receptor- excision circles (TRECs) and kappa-deleting recombination-excision circles (KRECs) from dried blood spots (DBS), allows early diagnosis and improved outcomes for the affected children. Determination of TREC/KREC levels from prospectively collected newborns' Guthrie cards and from DBS samples of patients with confirmed IEI was done using a commercial kit. Retrospective assessment of flow cytometry evaluation of TREC/KREC correspondence with lymphocyte subpopulations and evaluation of the correlations between TREC and KREC with immune cells, based on the data from patients with suspected or confirmed immune disorders, were conducted. 2,228 Guthrie cards were tested, 1276 for TREC only and 952 for both TREC and KREC. Eight newborns (0.36%) were TREC positive and 10 (1.05%) had KREC below the cut-off. The re-testing rate was 1.88%. Retrospective analysis demonstrated that the TREC/KREC assay identifies 100% of severe combined immune deficiencies (SCID) cases when DBS were collected at birth. Correlation analysis showed moderate significant correlations between TREC and the absolute numbers of CD4 cells (r = 0.634, p < 0.01) and total T cells (r = 0.536, p < 0.01). The ability of KREC levels to predict abnormal absolute (AUC of 0.772) and relative (AUC 0.731) levels of B cells was demonstrated.

Indexed as

IEIKRECnewborn screeningSCIDTREC

Identifiers

PMID36817401
PMCPMC9901256
OpenAlexW4318814674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.