Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817389›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Evaluating transfer prediction using machine learning for skill acquisition study under various practice conditions.

Anna Aniszewska-Stȩpień, Romain Hérault, Guillaume Hacques, Ludovic Seifert, Gilles Gasso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Aniszewska-StȩpieńLITIS EA4108, INSA Rouen Normandy, Normandy University, Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray, France.
Romain HéraultLITIS EA4108, INSA Rouen Normandy, Normandy University, Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray, France.
Guillaume HacquesCETAPS EA3832, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Rouen Normandy, Normandy University, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France.
Ludovic SeifertCETAPS EA3832, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Rouen Normandy, Normandy University, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France.
Gilles GassoLITIS EA4108, INSA Rouen Normandy, Normandy University, Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research highlighted the interest in 1) investigating the effect of variable practice on the dynamics of learning and 2) modeling the dynamics of motor skill learning to enhance understanding of individual pathways learners. Such modeling has not been suitable for predicting future performance, both in terms of retention and transfer to new tasks. The present study attempted to quantify, by means of a machine learning algorithm, the prediction of skill transfer for three practice conditions in a climbing task: constant practice (without any modifications applied during learning), imposed variable practice (with graded contextual modifications, i.e., the variants of the climbing route), and self-controlled variable practice (participants were given some control over their variant practice schedule). The proposed pipeline allowed us to measure the fitness of the test to the dataset, i.e., the ability of the dataset to be predictive of the skill transfer test. Behavioral data are difficult to model with statistical learning and tend to be 1) scarce (too modest data sample in comparison with the machine learning standards) and 2) flawed (data tend to contain voids in measurements). Despite these adversities, we were nevertheless able to develop a machine learning pipeline for behavioral data. The main findings demonstrate that the level of learning transfer varies, according to the type of practice that the dynamics pertain: we found that the self-controlled condition is more predictive of generalization ability in learners than the constant condition.

Indexed as

constant practicefeature selectionlearning dynamicslinear regressionpredictive modeltransfer skillvariable practice

Identifiers

PMID36817389
PMCPMC9937057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.