Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817278›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Cross-institutional Virtual Mock Oral Examination: A New Paradigm?

Arvind D Manisundaram, Sairandri Sathyanarayanan, Janhavi V Govande, Erik S Marques, Phuong D Nguyen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arvind D ManisundaramDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex.
Sairandri SathyanarayananDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex.
Janhavi V GovandeDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex.
Erik S MarquesDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex.
Phuong D NguyenDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex.
The University of Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mock oral examinations (MOEs) are shown to be valuable in preparation for national board oral examinations. Although traditionally conducted in-person, improved technological advances have supported exploring virtual alternatives. Furthermore, the cornoavirus disease 2019 pandemic has necessitated virtual learning. We hypothesized that the virtual platform would improve and expand the MOE experience to include collaborative institutions while approximating a board examination environment. Methods: Sixteen senior plastic surgery residents and 14 faculty from three separate programs participated in a cross-institutional virtual MOE. Over a single day, each trainee was evaluated by two faculty from a separate institution on six scenarios, including digitally interactive photographs. Immediate postexamination debriefing with feedback was performed. All participants were subsequently invited to complete an anonymous survey regarding MOE experience, accuracy, and stress level, with responses graded on a Likert scale (1-5). Results: Twenty-three participants completed the survey, with 87% having prior MOE experience; however, only 26.1% of participants had virtual MOE experience. Most found the virtual platform more convenient (4.18 Conclusions: The majority of participants found the virtual MOE experience valuable and comparable to in-person. These results reinforce that a virtual MOE provides an acceptable alternative with greater convenience and improved cross-institutional collaborative efforts.

Identifiers

PMID36817278
PMCPMC9937090
OpenAlexW4321224285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.