Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817269›Full record

ArticleCentral-European journal of immunology2022

Humoral immune response to COVID-19 infection or vaccination among celiac disease patients.

Eman Albatayneh, Yasmeen Alabdallat, Eman Kreishan, Hanin Ayash, Mohammad Abu-Lubad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central-European journal of immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eman AlbataynehDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Jordan.
Yasmeen AlabdallatMedical student, Faculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Jordan.
Eman KreishanMedical student, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Al-Karak, Jordan.
Hanin AyashMedical student, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Al-Karak, Jordan.
Mohammad Abu-LubadDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Jordan.
Mutah University · JOHashemite University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Celiac disease (CD) is the most common autoimmune disease (AD) of the small intestine, affecting 1-2% of the population globally. It is characterized by the serological presence of autoantibodies (Abs), tissue transglutaminase antibody (tTGA), immunoglobulin (Ig) A, and IgG. Production of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 after infection with the virus or vaccination is not well understood, especially among CD patients. The goal of this study was to measure the IgG antibodies in Jordanian patients infected with or vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 virus with different types of vaccines (Pfizer- BioNTech BNT162b2, Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV or Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S) and compare them with the levels in non-celiac controls. IgG levels induced by different vaccines were also compared. Material and methods: The data for this cross-sectional study were obtained via a survey, whereby respondents were identified through convenience sampling. The healthy controls were given Questionnaire A while CD patients completed Questionnaire B. The blood samples from all participants were tested for the COVID-19 nucleocapsid protein (NP) IgG serum levels for participants previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, and spike (S) protein (S1/S2) IgG serum levels for vaccine recipients. Results: The study involved 116 individuals, 60 (51.7%) of whom were CD patients. The NP IgG serum levels in the infected and S1/S2 IgG levels in the vaccinated CD patients were significantly lower than the levels in controls (48.3 ±44.5 vs. 81.1 ±34.4 and 49 ±45.8 vs. 75.7 ±38.6, p = 0.002). Moreover, only the Pfizer vaccine induced significantly more IgG antibodies in controls compared to CD patients (88.8 ±29.1 vs. 58.3 ±45.4, p = 0.01). On the other hand, the IgG levels were significantly higher in CD patients who received the Pfizer relative to the AstraZeneca vaccine (58.3 ±45.5 vs. 13.0 ±23.6, p = 0.03). After adjusting for presence of CD, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, vaccine type, smoking, gluten adherence, and time since infection or vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG Abs and/or NP IgG Abs positivity was significantly associated with CD absence and negatively with vaccine type (AstraZeneca) with the odds ratios (ORs) of 9.6 (95% CI = 1.5-59.2, p = 0.015) and 0.03 (95% CI = 0.004-0.244. p = 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: We concluded that patients with CD had lower SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG Abs and NP IgG Abs levels than controls, and CD patients who received the Pfizer vaccine had higher IgG levels than patients who received the AstraZeneca vaccine. We recommend that further research be conducted to address the dynamics of the antibody responses in CD patients regarding COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

autoimmuneceliac diseaseCOVID-19IgG antibodyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36817269
PMCPMC9896984
OpenAlexW4293211528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.