ArticleCentral-European journal of immunology2022
Humoral immune response to COVID-19 infection or vaccination among celiac disease patients.
Article in Central-European journal of immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic and Mucosal Immunogenicity of Monovalent XBB.1.5-Adapted COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Vaccines · 2024Article
- The impact of comorbidity status in COVID-19 vaccines effectiveness before and after SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in northeastern Mexico: a retrospective multi-hospital study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Celiac disease (CD) is the most common autoimmune disease (AD) of the small intestine, affecting 1-2% of the population globally. It is characterized by the serological presence of autoantibodies (Abs), tissue transglutaminase antibody (tTGA), immunoglobulin (Ig) A, and IgG. Production of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 after infection with the virus or vaccination is not well understood, especially among CD patients. The goal of this study was to measure the IgG antibodies in Jordanian patients infected with or vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 virus with different types of vaccines (Pfizer- BioNTech BNT162b2, Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV or Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S) and compare them with the levels in non-celiac controls. IgG levels induced by different vaccines were also compared. Material and methods: The data for this cross-sectional study were obtained via a survey, whereby respondents were identified through convenience sampling. The healthy controls were given Questionnaire A while CD patients completed Questionnaire B. The blood samples from all participants were tested for the COVID-19 nucleocapsid protein (NP) IgG serum levels for participants previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, and spike (S) protein (S1/S2) IgG serum levels for vaccine recipients. Results: The study involved 116 individuals, 60 (51.7%) of whom were CD patients. The NP IgG serum levels in the infected and S1/S2 IgG levels in the vaccinated CD patients were significantly lower than the levels in controls (48.3 ±44.5 vs. 81.1 ±34.4 and 49 ±45.8 vs. 75.7 ±38.6, p = 0.002). Moreover, only the Pfizer vaccine induced significantly more IgG antibodies in controls compared to CD patients (88.8 ±29.1 vs. 58.3 ±45.4, p = 0.01). On the other hand, the IgG levels were significantly higher in CD patients who received the Pfizer relative to the AstraZeneca vaccine (58.3 ±45.5 vs. 13.0 ±23.6, p = 0.03). After adjusting for presence of CD, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, vaccine type, smoking, gluten adherence, and time since infection or vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG Abs and/or NP IgG Abs positivity was significantly associated with CD absence and negatively with vaccine type (AstraZeneca) with the odds ratios (ORs) of 9.6 (95% CI = 1.5-59.2, p = 0.015) and 0.03 (95% CI = 0.004-0.244. p = 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: We concluded that patients with CD had lower SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG Abs and NP IgG Abs levels than controls, and CD patients who received the Pfizer vaccine had higher IgG levels than patients who received the AstraZeneca vaccine. We recommend that further research be conducted to address the dynamics of the antibody responses in CD patients regarding COVID-19 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.