Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36817096›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Large-scale organoid study suggests effects of trisomy 21 on early fetal neurodevelopment are more subtle than variability between isogenic lines and experiments.

Jan T Czerminski, Oliver D King, Jeanne B Lawrence

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Hallmarks of Aneuploidy in Cancer and Congenital Syndromes.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan T CzerminskiMedical Scientist Training Program, Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Oliver D KingDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Jeanne B LawrenceDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Training at UMMS Administrative SupplementT32GM107000 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI KIEFE, CATARINA I. · 2013 to 2022
$4.9M
A Novel Approach to Molecular Cell Pathologies of Human Down Syndrome and DS-ADR01HD091357 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI JEANNE Bentley LAWRENCE · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
Translational Epigenetics with XIST: Silencing Trisomy in Human Organoid and Mouse Models of Down SyndromeR01HD094788 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LAWRENCE, JEANNE BENTLEY · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Modeling Down Syndrome Neural Phenotypes with Chromosomal SilencingF30HD086975 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CZERMINSKI, JAN · 2017 to 2020
$126k
NICHD NIH HHS F30 HD086975NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091357NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094788NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM107000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines cortical organoids generated from a panel of isogenic trisomic and disomic iPSC lines (subclones) as a model of early fetal brain development in Down syndrome (DS). An initial experiment comparing organoids from one trisomic and one disomic line showed many genome-wide transcriptomic differences and modest differences in cell-type proportions, suggesting there may be a neurodevelopmental phenotype that is due to trisomy of chr21. To better control for multiple sources of variation, we undertook a highly robust study of ∼1,200 organoids using an expanded panel of six all-isogenic lines, three disomic, and three trisomic. The power of this experimental design was indicated by strong detection of the ∼1.5-fold difference in chr21 genes. However, the numerous expression differences in non-chr21 genes seen in the smaller experiment fell away, and the differences in cell-type representation between lines did not correlate with trisomy 21. Results suggest that the initial smaller experiment picked up differences between small organoid samples and individual isogenic lines, which "averaged out" in the larger panel of isogenic lines. Our results indicate that even when organoid and batch variability are better controlled for, variation between isogenic cell lines (even subclones) may obscure, or be conflated with, subtle neurodevelopmental phenotypes that may be present in ∼2nd trimester DS brain development. Interestingly, despite this variability between organoid batches and lines, and the "fetal stage" of these organoids, an increase in secreted Aβ40 peptide levels-an Alzheimer-related cellular phenotype-was more strongly associated with trisomy 21 status than were neurodevelopmental shifts in cell-type composition.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecerebral organoidsDown syndromeiPS cellsneurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID36817096
PMCPMC9935940
OpenAlexW4319161765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.