ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2023
Effect of botulinum toxin A on pain, bite force, and satisfaction of patients with bruxism: A randomized single-blind clinical trial comparing two protocols.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07640035 (Objective Assessment of Bruxism and Treatment Response Using Digital Occlusal Analysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Objective Assessment of Bruxism and Treatment Response Using Digital Occlusal Analysis: A Clinical Study of Botulinum Toxin-A
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Botulinum Toxin Injection to Treat Bruxism in a Child: A Case Report and Technique Description.Cureus · 2026Article
- Functional Effects of BoNT-A Application in Masseter Muscle in Patients with Symptoms of Bruxism.Toxins · 2025Article
- Facial volume reduction and masticatory function after masseter botulinum toxin injection: a prospective study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injection into the Masseter Muscle in Patients with Bruxism: A single-arm, Institutional-Based Prospective Clinical Study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance in Endodontically Treated Molars Using Lithium Disilicate and Composite Overlays Versus Endocrowns.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Exploring New and Potential Indications for Botulinum Toxin Treatment: An Updated Literature Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Botulinum toxin for bruxism treatment: a nationwide study among oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Germany.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Can botulinum toxin injection alleviate the pain of bruxism? A Bayesian network analysis and a single-arm analysis.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluating The Effect of Botulinum Neurotoxin on the Improvement of Parafunctional and Dysfunctional Symptoms of the Temporomandibular Joint: A Pilot Study : Therapeutic Effect of Botulinum Neurotoxin on Temporomandibular Joint.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- Bruxism and Botulinum Injection: Challenges and Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The current study aims to evaluate bite force, perception of orofacial pain, and treatment satisfaction of patients with bruxism using two protocols of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injections. Material and Methods: Two groups of patients seeking bruxism treatment and presenting bilateral orofacial pain of muscle origin were randomly created according to BTX-A injection sites: masseter muscle only, bilaterally (3 points in each muscle, 10 U per point), and masseter and temporal muscles (3 points in each masseter muscle and 2 points in each temporal muscle, 10 U per point). The patients were evaluated preoperatively and longitudinally at 15, 90, 120, and 180 days by the use of visual analog scales for pain and treatment satisfaction and a gnathodynamometer for bite force recording. Results: The final sample included 10 participants in each group. Both groups presented mitigation of pain at 15, 90, 120, and 180 days in comparison with baseline; however, reduction in the posterior bite force was noted only at 15, 90, and 120 days. Quite high treatment satisfaction was reported from both groups at 15, 90, 120, and 180 days. No differences were observed between the groups in all evaluations and study periods. Conclusion: In general, considering pain relief, reduction in bite force, and treatment satisfaction, both protocols of BTX-A seem to be somewhat equally effective in the short-term management (up to 120 days) of bruxism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.