ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2023
Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictions of postoperative and perioperative complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using machine learning algorithms: systematic review.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- High Accuracy, Questionable References: Large Language Models' Performance and Citation Reliability in Foot and Ankle Surgery Examinations.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Interpretable artificial intelligence for predicting blood transfusion after surgery for femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Evaluating ChatGPT's Triage and Diagnostic Capabilities in Patients Presenting With Common Causes of Foot and Ankle Pain.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Review
- Detecting Fifth Metatarsal Fractures on Radiographs Through the Lens of Smartphones: The FIXUS AI Algorithm.Cureus · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for predicting 30-day mortality after surgery for femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Automated weight-bearing foot measurements using an artificial intelligence-based software.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- A Study of Orthopedic Patient Leaflets and Readability of AI-Generated Text in Foot and Ankle Surgery (SOLE-AI).Cureus · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Quality and Usability of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses to Common Patient Questions in Foot and Ankle Surgery.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There has been a rapid increase in research applying artificial intelligence (AI) to various subspecialties of orthopaedic surgery, including foot and ankle surgery. The purpose of this systematic review is to (1) characterize the topics and objectives of studies using AI in foot and ankle surgery, (2) evaluate the performance of their models, and (3) evaluate their validity (internal or external validation). Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases in December 2022. All studies that used AI or its subsets machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in the setting of foot and ankle surgery relevant to orthopaedic surgeons were included. Studies were evaluated for their demographics, subject area, outcomes of interest, model(s) tested, model(s)' performance, and validity (internal or external). Results: A total of 31 studies met inclusion criteria: 14 studies investigated AI for image interpretation, 13 studies investigated AI for clinical predictions, and 4 studies were grouped as "other." Studies commonly explored AI for ankle fractures, calcaneus fractures, hallux valgus, Achilles tendon pathologies, plantar fasciitis, and sports injuries. For studies reporting the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), AUCs ranged from 0.64 (poor) to 0.99 (excellent). Two studies (6.45%) reported external validation. Conclusion: Applications of AI in the field of foot and ankle surgery are expanding, particularly for image interpretation and clinical predictions. Current model performances range from poor to excellent, and most studies lack external validation, demonstrating a need for further research prior to deploying AI-based clinical applications. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.