Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816958›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy.

Chonghan Zhong, Houqiong Ju, Dongning Liu, Penghui He, Daqiang Wang, Hongxin Yu, Weijie Lu, Taiyuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chonghan ZhongDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, China.
Houqiong JuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, China.
Dongning LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, China.
Penghui HeDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, China.
Daqiang WangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, China.
Hongxin YuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, China.
Weijie LuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, China.
Taiyuan LiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy. Methods: In this study, we analyzed data collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. In addition, in a 7:3 randomized design, all patients were split into two groups (development and validation cohorts). CSS predictors were selected Results: We selected 4,310 lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy, including a development cohort (70%, 3,017) and a validation cohort (30%, 1,293). The nomogram correlation C-index for the development cohort and the validation cohort was 0.702 (95% CI, 0.687-0.717) and 0.690 (95% CI, 0.665-0.715), respectively. The calibration curves for 3- and 5-year CSS showed great concordance. The 3- and 5-year areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC curves in the development cohort were 0.758 and 0.740, respectively, and 0.735 and 0.730 in the validation cohort, respectively. Following the establishment of the nomogram, we also established a risk stratification system. According to their nomogram total points, patients were divided into three risk groups. There were significant differences between the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (p< 0.05). Conclusions: As a result of our research, we developed a highly discriminatory and accurate nomogram and associated risk classification system to predict CSS in lymph-node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy. This model can help predict the prognosis of patients with lymph- node- positive rectal cancer.

Indexed as

cancer-specific survivallymph node positivenomogramrectal cancerrisk stratificationSEER

Identifiers

PMID36816958
PMCPMC9931193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.