ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Endoscopic transcranial transdiaphragmatic approach in a single-stage surgery for giant pituitary adenomas.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgically treated giant pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis with institutional cohort.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of complete resection rate and endocrine function improvement between neuronavigation-assisted neuroendoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach and microscopic transcranial approach for giant pituitary adenoma.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The treatment for giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs, maximal diameter >4 cm) remains challenging, with remarkable mortality and morbidity, and there is no consensus on the optimal surgical approach. Gross total resection (GTR) for GPAs is difficult to achieve through a single transsphenoidal or transcranial approach. Any residual tumor is at risk for postoperative apoplexy. In this study, we propose a new surgical technique for resecting the GPAs in a sing-stage transcranial surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of 4 patients with complicated GPAs, who had been treated Results: All patients had nonfunctioning GPAs and preoperative visual disturbances. In three patients, GTR was achieved, and in one patient, near-total resection (90%-100% of the tumor) was achieved. Three patients attained improved postoperative visual function, while one patient's vision remained unchanged. One patient suffered a deficiency in adrenocorticotropic hormone along with thyroid-stimulating hormone, and one patient developed diabetes insipidus. Notably, none of the patients suffered cerebrospinal fluid leakage. However, one patient developed an epidural hematoma and underwent decompressive craniectomy. Conclusions: The endoscopic transcranial transdiaphragmatic approach in a single-stage surgery can be efficiently and safely performed for maximal excision of GPAs with extensive suprasellar extension. Furthermore, relative to the conventional combined or staged approaches, this innovative surgical strategy provides neurosurgeons with a clear operative field with reduced invasiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.