Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816791›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2023

Testing generalized linear models with high-dimensional nuisance parameter.

Jinsong Chen, Quefeng Li, Hua Yun Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Novel Approach of High Dimensional Linear Hypothesis Testing Problem.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinsong ChenCollege of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W Taylor St, Chicago, Illinois 60612, U.S.A.
Quefeng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, U.S.A.
Hua Yun ChenSchool of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2121 W Taylor St, Chicago, Illinois 60612, U.S.A.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Integrative Analysis of Large Scale Neuroimaging DataR01AG073259 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LI, QUEFENG · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalized linear models often have a high-dimensional nuisance parameters, as seen in applications such as testing gene-environment interactions or gene-gene interactions. In these scenarios, it is essential to test the significance of a high-dimensional sub-vector of the model's coefficients. Although some existing methods can tackle this problem, they often rely on the bootstrap to approximate the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic, and thus are computationally expensive. Here, we propose a computationally efficient test with a closed-form limiting distribution, which allows the parameter being tested to be either sparse or dense. We show that under certain regularity conditions, the type I error of the proposed method is asymptotically correct, and we establish its power under high-dimensional alternatives. Extensive simulations demonstrate the good performance of the proposed test and its robustness when certain sparsity assumptions are violated. We also apply the proposed method to Chinese famine sample data in order to show its performance when testing the significance of gene-environment interactions.

Indexed as

Dense parameterModel misspecificationU-statistics

Identifiers

PMID36816791
PMCPMC9933885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.