Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816789›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2023

Knowledge and acceptability of cervical cancer screening among female undergraduates in Babcock University Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.

Julius O Maitanmi, Temidara E Fabiyi, Oluwadara Eniola, Toluwalope O Sansi, Josiah O Blessing, Bukola Maitanmi, Margaret O Ojewale, Abiodun A Dairo, Damilola A Adebiyi, Oluwadamilare Akingbade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julius O MaitanmiSchool of Nursing, Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Ogun State 121103, Nigeria.
Temidara E FabiyiSchool of Nursing, Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Ogun State 121103, Nigeria.
Oluwadara EniolaInstitute of Nursing Research, Osogbo, Osun State 230262, Nigeria.
Toluwalope O SansiSchool of Nursing, Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Ogun State 121103, Nigeria.
Josiah O BlessingInstitute of Nursing Research, Osogbo, Osun State 230262, Nigeria.
Bukola MaitanmiSchool of Nursing, Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Ogun State 121103, Nigeria.
Margaret O OjewaleNigerian Army College of Nursing, Lagos 101212, Nigeria.
Abiodun A DairoInstitute of Nursing Research, Osogbo, Osun State 230262, Nigeria.
Damilola A AdebiyiInstitute of Nursing Research, Osogbo, Osun State 230262, Nigeria.
Oluwadamilare AkingbadeInstitute of Nursing Research, Osogbo, Osun State 230262, Nigeria.
Babcock University · NGOsun State University · NGChinese University of Hong Kong · CNTurks and Caicos National Museum · TC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is currently the fourth most common cancer among women. There are several factors which have, in recent times, posed a threat to the recognition and acceptance of CC screening in Nigeria. This study was undertaken to assess the predictors of knowledge of female undergraduates at Babcock University, Ogun State, Nigeria, on CC screening and the level of acceptance readiness. Method: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey of 345 female undergraduates at Babcock University, Ogun State, Nigeria, using a self-administered structured questionnaire. Data collected were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 software. Hypotheses were tested using Pearson product-moment correlation at Results: This study revealed that majority of the respondents have a substantial awareness and knowledge of CC screening (68.4%). The study suggested that health talk and level of exposure might be responsible for the good knowledge. While 47.5% were ready to undergo CC screening, 76.2% were ready to undergo the screening if a health professional performed the procedure, and 66.1% will tell their family members to go for screening. However, 49.9% reported not having the correct information on CC screening. A significant correlation was found between knowledge and acceptability of CC screening among the students ( Conclusion: As the acceptability of CC screening was high, CC screening facilities could be made available for the students. Similarly, educational interventions to improve awareness of CC screening among this population are warranted, as over one-third reported they did not have the correct information on CC screening.

Indexed as

acceptabilitycervical cancerknowledge screening

Identifiers

PMID36816789
PMCPMC9937068
OpenAlexW4318700703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.