Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816707›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning.

Vasanthanathan Poongavanam, Florian Kölling, Anja Giese, Andreas H Göller, Lutz Lehmann, Daniel Meibom, Jan Kihlberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From prediction to performance:International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vasanthanathan PoongavanamDepartment of Chemistry-BMC, Box 576, Uppsala University, 75123Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-9247
Florian KöllingComputational Molecular Design, Bayer AG, 42096Wuppertal, Germany.
Anja GieseDrug Discovery Sciences, Bayer AG, 13342Berlin, Germany.
Andreas H GöllerComputational Molecular Design, Bayer AG, 42096Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4343-4063
Lutz LehmannDrug Discovery Sciences, Bayer AG, 42113Wuppertal, Germany.
Daniel MeibomDrug Discovery Sciences, Bayer AG, 42113Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-9842
Jan KihlbergDepartment of Chemistry-BMC, Box 576, Uppsala University, 75123Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4205-6040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approaches for predicting proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) cell permeability are of major interest to reduce resource-demanding synthesis and testing of low-permeable PROTACs. We report a comprehensive investigation of the scope and limitations of machine learning-based binary classification models developed using 17 simple descriptors for large and structurally diverse sets of cereblon (CRBN) and von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) PROTACs. For the VHL PROTAC set, kappa nearest neighbor and random forest models performed best and predicted the permeability of a blinded test set with >80% accuracy (

Identifiers

PMID36816707
PMCPMC9933238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.