ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Effects of intensive vs. standard blood pressure control on cognitive function:
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03015311 (Strategy of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strategy of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Randomized Open-Label Blinded-Endpoint Trial
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intensive BP Control and Cognitive Function: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Trial
- Association of the C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index with new-onset myocardial infarction risk: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Epidemiological and clinical evidence on blood pressure management for the prevention of dementia: striving for a healthy 100-year life.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- The relationship between C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index and cardiovascular disease: insights from the China health and retirement longitudinal study (CHARLS).Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- White matter changes underlie hypertension-related cognitive decline in older adults.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The STEP (Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the older Hypertensive Patients) trial showed that intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control resulted in a lower incidence of cardiovascular events than standard treatment. This study analyzed the effects of intensive SBP lowering on cognitive function. Methods: STEP was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of hypertensive patients aged 60-80 years. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to SBP goals of 110-130 mmHg (intensive treatment) or 130-150 mmHg (standard treatment). Each individual was asked to complete a cognitive function test (Mini-Mental State Examination; MMSE) at baseline and during follow-up. The primary outcome for this study was the annual change in MMSE score. Subjects with a score less than education-specific cutoff point were categorized as cognitive decline. Results: The analysis enrolled 6,501 participants (3,270 participants in the intensive-treatment and 3,231 participants in the standard-treatment groups). Median follow-up was 3.34 years. There was a minor change in MMSE score, with an annual change of -0.001 [95% confidence interval [CI] -0.020, 0.018] and 0.030 (95% CI 0.011, 0.049) in the intensive- and standard-treatment groups, respectively ( Conclusions: Compared with standard treatment, intensive SBP treatment did not result in a significant change in cognitive function test score. The impact of intensive blood pressure lowering was not evident using this global cognitive function test. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03015311.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.