Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816487›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Computational models for prediction of protein-protein interaction in rice and

Biswajit Karan, Satyajit Mahapatra, Sitanshu Sekhar Sahu, Dev Mani Pandey, Sumit Chakravarty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Biswajit KaranDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi, India.
Satyajit MahapatraDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi, India.
Sitanshu Sekhar SahuDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi, India.
Dev Mani PandeyDepartment of Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi, India.
Sumit ChakravartyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, United States.
Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra · INKennesaw State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Plant-microbe interactions play a vital role in the development of strategies to manage pathogen-induced destructive diseases that cause enormous crop losses every year. Rice blast is one of the severe diseases to rice Methods: In this paper, four genomic information-based models such as (i) the interolog, (ii) the domain, (iii) the gene ontology, and (iv) the phylogenetic-based model are developed for predicting the interaction between Results and Discussion: A total of 59,430 interacting pairs between 1,801 rice proteins and 135 blast fungus proteins are obtained from the four models. Furthermore, a machine learning model is developed to assess the predicted interactions. Using composition-based amino acid composition (AAC) and conjoint triad (CT) features, an accuracy of 88% and 89% is achieved, respectively. When tested on the experimental dataset, the CT feature provides the highest accuracy of 95%. Furthermore, the specificity of the model is verified with other pathogen-host datasets where less accuracy is obtained, which confirmed that the model is specific to

Indexed as

domaingene ontologyinterologM. griseaphylogeneticriceSVM

Identifiers

PMID36816487
PMCPMC9929577
OpenAlexW4318778550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.