Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816272›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

A systematic review of urban green space research over the last 30 years: A bibliometric analysis.

Jenő Zsolt Farkas, Edit Hoyk, Mariana Batista de Morais, György Csomós

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantifying Nature: Introducing NatureScoreAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenő Zsolt FarkasCentre for Economic and Regional Studies, Great Plain Research Department, 3 Rakóczi út, Kecskemét, 6000, Hungary.
Edit HoykCentre for Economic and Regional Studies, Great Plain Research Department, 3 Rakóczi út, Kecskemét, 6000, Hungary.
Mariana Batista de MoraisUniversity of Debrecen, Doctoral School of Earth Sciences, 1 Egyetem tér, Debrecen, 4032, Hungary.
György CsomósUniversity of Debrecen, Department of Civil Engineering, 2-4 Ótemető út, Debrecen, 4028, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, due to rapid urbanization, the provision of urban green spaces (UGSs) has become a primary goal of urban planning. As such, research on the benefits, effects, and challenges of UGSs has gained widespread attention among scholars. This paper comprehensively analyzes three decades of UGS research and its evolution; it conducts a bibliometric analysis of approximately 4000 articles and reviews from the Web of Science platform to discover the patterns and trends characterizing UGS research over time. We found that the pioneers of initial UGS research were the United States and Canada, whereas recently the European Union and China have become the global engines of research in the field. UGS research initially focused on studying urban forests, gradually shifting toward green spaces located in inner urban areas. Early on, researchers investigated UGSs (i.e., urban forests) from an ecological perspective. However, the most current research phase focuses on the social aspects of UGSs, characterized by such keywords as environmental justice and accessibility. Furthermore, the introduction of geographic information systems (GIS) has given new impetus to the evolution of UGS research and has remained the most used technological advancement besides remote sensing techniques. As the social aspects of UGS research have gained importance, new research methods have been employed, such as machine learning, big data and social media data analysis, and artificial intelligence, most recently.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisKeyword burstKeyword clusterUrban forestUrban green spaceVOS Viewer

Identifiers

PMID36816272
PMCPMC9932659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.