Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816254›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

A bibliometric analysis of research on tourism content marketing: Background knowledge and thematic evolution.

Phuong Minh Binh Nguyen, Xuan Lan Pham, Giang Nu To Truong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Phuong Minh Binh NguyenUniversity of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Xuan Lan PhamSchool of Management, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Giang Nu To TruongSchool of Management, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Content marketing is becoming an important trend in the tourism industry and is attracting the attention of many stakeholders. Previous studies have sporadically highlighted only some content marketing aspects, but none comprehensively described the topic. To fill this gap, this study adopts a comprehensive approach by combining two bibliometric co-citation and co-keyword analysis methods of 659 articles on content marketing in travel sectors. The co-citation results indicate that tourism content marketing research has been concentrated on the themes of (1) the impact of electronic word of mouth (eWOM) and word of mouth (WOM) on business performance; (2) the role of social media, user-generated content (UGC) and destination image formulation; (3) the impact of eWOM and UGC on the decision-making process; as well as (4) opportunities and challenges. Additionally, based on the co-keyword analysis, hot research topics are explored, including online review implementation; UGC implementation; communication and information search; customer behavior prediction model; the decision-making process; and issues related to user experience, quality, and management. Among these, UGC implementation is the most likely trend that researchers can develop in the future. In addition, the influence of other types of UGC (e.g., user-generated travel videos) is a promising avenue for future research. This study will help researchers understand the role and influence of tourism content marketing. Furthermore, tourism marketers can use content marketing to restore destination image and address last-minute booking issues after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

BibliometricCo-citationContent marketingCo-wordTourism

Identifiers

PMID36816254
PMCPMC9929313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.