ArticleHeliyon2023
GIS based soil loss assessment using RUSLE model: A case of Horo district, western Ethiopia.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Estimating soil erosion utilizing geospatial method and revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) of Abu Ghraibat Watershed, Eastern Misan Governorate, Iraq.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- SWAT-based soil erosion and sediment yield modeling in the upper Gilgel Abay catchment, Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Land degradation in the form of soil erosion is a worldwide challenge and make environmental problem that affects crop yields, makes livelihoods difficult, and creates crises. The main objective of this study was to measure soil loss using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) Model in Horo district, Western Ethiopia. RUSLE with a Geographical Information System (GIS) was used to quantify soil loss using rainfall, soil, a digital elevation model (DEM), and satellite image datasets as factor value inputs. Those factors are erosivity (R), erodibility (K), topography (LS), cover management (C), and conservation support practice (P) layer values that can be interactively used using weighted overlay in ArcGIS 10.8. The result shows that the maximum and minimum potential annual soil loss of the study area ranged from nil (0.01 t/ha/yr) on plain surfaces to 216.01 t/ha/yr. The average annual soil loss rate in the study area was 13.27 t ha/yr. The highest mean annual soil loss of 216.01 t/ha/yr were observed from farmland and it was the largest portion of the study area, which covered about 64243.02 ha and represented about 73.75% of the total. As a result, forest land (16383.23 ha) was the second-largest, accounting for 18.81% of the total area. Consequently, the study revealed that the farmland was more vulnerable to erosion than other land uses and land cover types. Hence, information on average annual soil loss is important for selecting appropriate conservation measures to reduce on-site soil loss and its off-site effects. Therefore, farmers and other expected bodies should have focused on soil conservation and management practices at the highest soil loss severity classes, which must get priority for conservation by stakeholders, agents, and the government.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.