ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2023
Small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted laser
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring multi-level risk factors and post-war burdens of trachomatous trichiasis among displaced population in Raya Kobo districts, implication for urgent action.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo report the safety, efficacy, and accuracy of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) or femtosecond-assisted laser
methodsFour patients with monocular corneal opacity (3 due to mechanical injury, 1 due to a firecracker wound) were recruited and treated with refractive surgery (3 for SMILE, 1 for FS-LASIK combined with limbal relaxing incision (LRI). Preoperative ocular manifestations, surgical details, postoperative visual outcomes, corneal opacity parameters, and corneal topography were analyzed.
resultsPreoperatively, spherical diopter ranged from -3.0 D to -4.75 D with cylinder ranging from -0.75 to -5.0 D, and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) ranging from 20/25 to 20/20. One eye's corneal opacity was located in the central zone and three were in the mid-peripheral optical zone. Three patients underwent uneventful SMILE in both eyes, whilst one patient underwent FS-LASIK for high astigmatism in both eyes and LRI in the right eye. CDVA of the eye with corneal opacity ranged from 20/22 to 20/20 one to six weeks postoperatively. Two patients achieved better CDVA and no patients lost Snellen lines. The postoperative diopter was within ±0.75 D for all eyes. Significant edema existed above the corneal opacity in one eye and dissipated soon. No eccentric corneal topography or morphological anomaly of the corneal cap or flap was observed.
conclusionThe cases demonstrate that SMILE or FS-LASIK is safe and effective to treat myopic astigmatism combined with deep corneal opacity lesions after comprehensive preoperative evaluation and appropriate candidate selection. FS-LASIK combined with LRI is also sufficient for correcting high astigmatism due to corneal scarring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.