Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816193›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2023

The impact of stress and anesthesia on animal models of infectious disease.

Rachel Layton, Daniel Layton, David Beggs, Andrew Fisher, Peter Mansell, Kelly J Stanger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Translational In Vivo Assays in Behavioral Biology.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel LaytonAustralian Centre for Disease Preparedness, CSIRO, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Daniel LaytonAustralian Centre for Disease Preparedness, CSIRO, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
David BeggsFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Andrew FisherFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter MansellFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kelly J StangerAustralian Centre for Disease Preparedness, CSIRO, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUAustralian Centre for Disease Preparedness · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress and general anesthesia have an impact on the functional response of the organism due to the detrimental effects on cardiovascular, immunological, and metabolic function, which could limit the organism's response to an infectious event. Animal studies have formed an essential step in understanding and mitigating infectious diseases, as the complexities of physiology and immunity cannot yet be replicated

Indexed as

animal immunityanimal models of diseaseanimal monitoringimpacts of anesthesiaimpacts of stressinfectious disease researchlaboratory animal welfaresurgical stress

Identifiers

PMID36816193
PMCPMC9933909
OpenAlexW4319042964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.