Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816189›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Veterinarian perceptions and practices in prevention and control of influenza virus in the Midwest United States swine farms.

Daniel C A Moraes, Amy L Vincent Baker, Xin Wang, Zhengyuan Zhu, Emily Berg, Giovani Trevisan, Jianqiang Zhang, Swaminathan Jayaraman, Daniel C L Linhares, Phillip C Gauger and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Swine influenza A virus: challenges and novel vaccine strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel C A MoraesDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Amy L Vincent BakerVirus and Prion Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA-ARS, Ames, IA, United States.
Xin WangDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Zhengyuan ZhuDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Emily BergDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Giovani TrevisanDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Jianqiang ZhangDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Swaminathan JayaramanDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Daniel C L LinharesDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Phillip C GaugerDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Gustavo S SilvaDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Iowa State University · USNational Animal Disease Center · US

Funding

NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response: Universal Influenza Vaccine Research Activities75N93021C00015 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HENSLEY, SCOTT · 2021 to 2025
$50.7M
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93021C00015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza A virus (IAV) is an endemic respiratory pathogen affecting swine worldwide and is a public health concern as a zoonotic pathogen. Veterinarians may respond to IAV infection in swine with varied approaches depending on their perception of its economic impact on human and animal health. This study considered three primary veterinary practice categories: swine exclusive veterinary practitioner, large animal practitioner, which corresponds to veterinarians that work predominantly with food animals including but not exclusively porcine, and mixed animal practitioner, which corresponds to veterinarians working with companion and food animals. This survey aimed to assess U.S. veterinarian perceptions, biosecurity practices, and control methods for IAV in swine. In this study, 54.5% (188/345) of the veterinarians that were targeted responded to all portions of the survey. The study results presented different perceptions regarding IAV among veterinarians in different types of veterinary practices and the current IAV mitigation practices implemented in swine farms based on strategic decisions. Collectively, this study also revealed the veterinarians' perceptions that IAV as a health problem in swine is increasing, IAV has a moderate economic impact, and there is a high level of concern regarding IAV circulating in swine. These findings highlight the need for IAV surveillance data, improved vaccine strategies, as well as important opportunities regarding methods of control and biosecurity. Additionally, results of this survey suggest biosecurity practices associated with the veterinarian's swine operations and prevention of zoonotic diseases can be strengthened through annual IAV vaccination of humans and support of sick leave policies for farm workers.

Indexed as

IAVsurveyswineveterinary practiceszoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID36816189
PMCPMC9936088
OpenAlexW4320496857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.