ReviewJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2022
Digital Rectal Exam in the Acute Hospital Setting: Bridging Patient Experience and the Physician Perspective.
Review in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative analysis of urinary microRNAs for prostate cancer detection: A proof-of-concept study.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The digital rectal examination is one of the key physical examination tools used in the assessment of gastrointestinal bleed, different rectal diseases and prostate disease. It is an invasive diagnostic test that has a significant level of patient anxiety and discomfort involved. Despite its many diagnostic utilities this exam has been vastly underutilised due to many limiting factors including lack of physician confidence with this bedside physical maneuver. This review includes patient's point of view and providers perspective on digital rectal examination in the inpatient hospital setting. Some of the contributors to negative patient experience include opposite gender of the physician performing the procedure, lack of procedural awareness and expectations and repeat examinations due to improper electronic health care record charting. A better understanding of the limitations and constraints involved from both the patient and physician perspective can help improve patient experience and overall clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.