Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36816158›Full record

ArticleJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2022

Diabetes-related Bias in Electronic Health Records and International Classification of Diseases.

Mihail Zilbermint

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. From language matters to stigma-free communication in diabetes: Evolution, challenges, and next steps.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mihail ZilbermintDivision of Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Baltimore, MD, 21209, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic health condition that affects the body's ability to convert food into energy. People living with diabetes, as well as doctors and hospitals, struggle to handle the challenge. Among these challenges is that the field of diabetology is filled with bias. People living with diabetes will say that "diabetes does not define them," yet they often refer to themselves as "diabetics." Doctors are frequently "trained" to call people "diabetics," and I am one of them. Psychological consequences associated with diabetes and obesity bias and stigma have been previously reported. People with diabetes may experience stigma and may blame themselves for causing their condition. They may have restricted opportunities in life and being subject to negative stereotyping. Importantly, obesity stigma has been recognized as a barrier to comprehensive and effective type 2 diabetes management. Electronic Health Records and the International Classification of Diseases are filled with diabetes-related bias. The word "diabetic" is frequently mentioned. Healthcare providers should recognize the person first, and not their medical condition. Changing behavior takes time, especially as this is a collective phenomenon. This commentary proposes the steps needed to be taken to overcome the challenge of behavior change and offers a personal reflection on the subject.

Indexed as

BiasDiabetesElectronic health recordsElectronic medical recordsInternational classification of diseasesStigma

Identifiers

PMID36816158
PMCPMC9924650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.