ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2023
Automated Molecular Subtyping of Breast Carcinoma Using Deep Learning Techniques.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domain generalisation challenges in breast cancer molecular classification using foundation models: a cross-cohort exploratory study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Multi-center study: ultrasound-based deep learning features for predicting Ki-67 expression in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Patho-Net: enhancing breast cancer classification using deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Cross-modal deep learning model for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Quantitative immunohistochemistry analysis of breast Ki67 based on artificial intelligence.Open life sciences · 2024Article
- Advances in the application of computational pathology in diagnosis, immunomicroenvironment recognition, and immunotherapy evaluation of breast cancer: a narrative review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMolecular subtyping is an important procedure for prognosis and targeted therapy of breast carcinoma, the most common type of malignancy affecting women. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis is the widely accepted method for molecular subtyping. It involves the assessment of the four molecular biomarkers namely estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and antigen Ki67 using appropriate antibody reagents. Conventionally, these biomarkers are assessed manually by a pathologist, who finally combines individual results to identify the molecular subtype. Molecular subtyping necessitates the status of all the four biomarkers together, and to the best of our knowledge, no such automated method exists. This paper proposes a novel deep learning framework for automatic molecular subtyping of breast cancer from IHC images. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A modified LadderNet architecture is proposed to segment the immunopositive elements from ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 biomarker slides. This architecture uses long skip connections to pass encoder feature space from different semantic levels to the decoder layers, allowing concurrent learning with multi-scale features. The entire architecture is an ensemble of multiple fully convolutional neural networks, and learning pathways are chosen adaptively based on input data. The segmentation stage is followed by a post-processing stage to quantify the extent of immunopositive elements to predict the final status for each biomarker.
resultsThe performance of segmentation models for each IHC biomarker is evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Furthermore, the biomarker prediction results are also evaluated. The results obtained by our method are highly in concordance with manual assessment by pathologists. CLINICAL IMPACT: Accurate automated molecular subtyping can speed up this pathology procedure, reduce pathologists' workload and associated costs, and facilitate targeted treatment to obtain better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.