ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023
Ethical layering in AI-driven polygenic risk scores-New complexities, new challenges.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for genomic science: a scoping review of concepts, architectures, applications, and open challenges.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Pooled it
- Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Pooled it
- From polygenic risk to functional genomics: a framework for precision gynecological disease modeling.Nature communications · 2026Review
- AI-driven computational drug design: tools, workflow and challenges.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Genomic Data Analysis: New Frontiers in Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- AI-driven radiomics in vascular disease: a narrative review of image analysis and clinical translation.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- A dialectical lens for AI and medical humanities: advancing responsible augmented humanism in Digital Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- What Is Fair? Defining Fairness in Machine Learning for Health.Statistics in medicine · 2025Review
- Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Future of Medical AI: Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Expert Workshop.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Bridging Genomics to Cardiology Clinical Practice: Artificial Intelligence in Optimizing Polygenic Risk Scores: A Systematic Review.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- How the world of biobanking is changing with artificial intelligence.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- The impact of dietary fiber on colorectal cancer patients based on machine learning.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Unlocking the potential of big data and AI in medicine: insights from biobanking.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Polygenic Risk Score for Cardiovascular Diseases in Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Review.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- From function to translation: Decoding genetic susceptibility to human diseases via artificial intelligence.Cell genomics · 2023Review
- AI-driven risk scores: should social scoring and polygenic scores based on ethnicity be equally prohibited?Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Researchers aim to develop polygenic risk scores as a tool to prevent and more effectively treat serious diseases, disorders and conditions such as breast cancer, type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease. Recently, machine learning techniques, in particular deep neural networks, have been increasingly developed to create polygenic risk scores using electronic health records as well as genomic and other health data. While the use of artificial intelligence for polygenic risk scores may enable greater accuracy, performance and prediction, it also presents a range of increasingly complex ethical challenges. The ethical and social issues of many polygenic risk score applications in medicine have been widely discussed. However, in the literature and in practice, the ethical implications of their confluence with the use of artificial intelligence have not yet been sufficiently considered. Based on a comprehensive review of the existing literature, we argue that this stands in need of urgent consideration for research and subsequent translation into the clinical setting. Considering the many ethical layers involved, we will first give a brief overview of the development of artificial intelligence-driven polygenic risk scores, associated ethical and social implications, challenges in artificial intelligence ethics, and finally, explore potential complexities of polygenic risk scores driven by artificial intelligence. We point out emerging complexity regarding fairness, challenges in building trust, explaining and understanding artificial intelligence and polygenic risk scores as well as regulatory uncertainties and further challenges. We strongly advocate taking a proactive approach to embedding ethics in research and implementation processes for polygenic risk scores driven by artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.