ArticleSouth African journal of sports medicine2022
Does transversus abdominis function correlate with prone plank and bench bridge holding time in club cricket players?
Article in South African journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating trunk endurance, dynamic stability, and in-game performance analysis in youth elite basketball players.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bridge and plank holding times are used to evaluate core stability. Transversus abdominis (TA) muscle function is assessed using ultrasound and also provides input on an individual's core stability. Objectives: A correlation study comparing TA muscle function with bridge and plank holding time in club cricketers. Methods: Seventeen male, premier league cricketers (age: 22.1 ± 3.3 years) participated in this study. Ultrasound was used to measure bilateral TA, internal oblique (OI) and external oblique (OE) muscle thickness at rest and during abdominal hollowing. Muscle function was measured by means of a Pearson's correlation as the change in muscle thickness from rest to abdominal hollowing and compared to holding time of the bench bridge and prone plank (seconds). Results: TA muscle thickness was preferentially recruited bilaterally (p=0.00001) during abdominal hollowing. No significant correlations were found between TA muscle function and holding time for the bench bridge (dominant (D): r = 0.03 [95% CI:-0.46-0.50]; non-dominant (ND): r = -0.02 [95% CI:-0.50-0.47]) or prone plank (D: r = -0.16 [95% CI:-0.60-0.34]; ND: r = -0.13 [95% CI:-0.57-0.38]). Conclusion: Prone plank and bench bridge holding times are not correlated with TA muscle function during abdominal hollowing. Core stability cannot rely on a single test to evaluate its effectiveness. In particular, the contribution of the local and global muscle system to 'core stability' needs to be evaluated independently. Therefore these tests are not sensitive enough to evaluate the contribution of the local muscle system to the global muscle system in a healthy, pain free, sporting population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.