Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36815918›Full record

ArticleSouth African journal of sports medicine2022

World netball cardiac screening guidelines.

L Bogwasi, D C Janse van Rensburg, G Bryant, J Orchard, J A Drezner

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South African journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.

L BogwasiSection Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0489-6492
D C Janse van RensburgSection Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1058-6992
G BryantWorld Netball Medical Commission, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7189-5911
J OrchardCentenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-7277
J A DreznerCenter for Sports Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-9120
The University of Sydney · AUMental Health Commission · IEThe Football Association · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden cardiac adverse events remain an area of concern in sport. The precise risk for netball athletes is unknown but the annual incidence of sudden cardiac death in sports is reported at 0.5-2 cases in 100 000 young competitive athletes between the ages of 12-35 years. Cardiac screening in the sport and exercise medicine context aims at identifying pathologies associated with catastrophic events when combined with physical activity. There is an ongoing debate relating to the standardisation of the pre-participatory medical assessment (PPMA). World Netball (WN) commissioned a cardiac screening policy (13 March 2022). The minimum PPMA recommended by World Netball is a history, physical examination, and a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). ECGs should be interpreted in accordance with athlete-specific ECG interpretation criteria. Expansion of sports cardiology experience and infrastructure, in combination with universal emergency response planning for sudden cardiac arrest, is intended to safeguard athlete health and player welfare in WN.

Indexed as

pre-participatory medical assessmentsudden cardiac arrestsudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID36815918
PMCPMC9924524
OpenAlexW4286698908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.