ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2023
Distinct Ecological Processes Mediate Domain-Level Differentiation in Microbial Spatial Scaling.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Range Comparison of Supraglacial Microbial Communities Between Gongga and Gangrigabu Mountains, Southeast Tibetan Plateau.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Seepage area of the cold seep exhibits strong homogeneous selection on prokaryotic community assembly and supports high depth variability of both archaeal and bacterial communities.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Particle partitioning and geography drive divergent microbial assembly and network connectivity in coastal South China Sea.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Horizontal distribution of marine microbial communities in the North Pacific Subtropical Front.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Conversion of steppe to cropland increases spatial heterogeneity of soil functional genes.The ISME journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spatial scaling of biodiversity, such as the taxa-area relationship (TAR) and distance-decay relationship (DDR), is a typical ecological pattern that is followed by both microbes and macrobes in natural ecosystems. Previous studies focusing on microbes mainly aimed to address whether and how different types of microbial taxa differ in spatial scaling patterns, leaving the underlying mechanisms largely untouched. In this study, the spatial scaling of different microbial domains and their associated ecological processes in an intertidal zone were comparatively investigated. The significant spatial scaling of biodiversity could be observed across all microbial domains, including archaea, bacteria, fungi, and protists. Among them, archaea and fungi were found with much stronger DDR slopes than those observed in bacteria and protists. For both TAR and DDR, rare subcommunities were mainly responsible for the observed spatial scaling patterns, except for the DDR of protists and bacteria. This was also evidenced by extending the TAR and DDR diversity metrics to Hill numbers. Further statistical analyses demonstrated that different microbial domains were influenced by different environmental factors and harbored distinct local community assembly processes. Of these, drift was mainly responsible for the compositional variations of bacteria and protists. Archaea were shaped by strong homogeneous selection, whereas fungi were more affected by dispersal limitation. Such differing ecological processes resulted in the domain-level differentiation of microbial spatial scaling. This study links ecological processes with microbial spatial scaling and provides novel mechanistic insights into the diversity patterns of microbes that belong to different trophic levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.