Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36815181›Full record

ArticleMedecine tropicale et sante internationale2022

[Evaluation of therapeutic coverage of mass treatment campaign against lymphatic filariasis in two health districts in Burkina Faso].

Mamadou Serme, Adama Zida, Roland Bougma, Appolinaire Kima, Christophe Nassa, Micheline Ouedraogo, Cathérine Kabre, Harouna Zoromé, Issa Guire, Dieudonné Nare and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Medecine tropicale et sante internationale, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mamadou SermeProgramme national de lutte contre les maladies tropicales négligées (PNMTN), Burkina Faso.
Adama ZidaÉcole doctorale Sciences et Santé, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Roland BougmaProgramme national de lutte contre les maladies tropicales négligées (PNMTN), Burkina Faso.
Appolinaire KimaProgramme national de lutte contre les maladies tropicales négligées (PNMTN), Burkina Faso.
Christophe NassaProgramme national de lutte contre les maladies tropicales négligées (PNMTN), Burkina Faso.
Micheline OuedraogoHelen Keller International, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Cathérine KabreProgramme national de lutte contre les maladies tropicales négligées (PNMTN), Burkina Faso.
Harouna ZoroméProgramme national de lutte contre les maladies tropicales négligées (PNMTN), Burkina Faso.
Issa GuireDirection régionale de la santé du Centre-Est, Burkina Faso.
Dieudonné NareHelen Keller International, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Clarisse BougoumaHelen Keller International, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Helen Keller International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & rationale: Burkina Faso has been implementing preventive chemotherapy against lymphatic filariasis since 2001. While 61 health districts (HDs) have stopped mass drug administration (MDA), transmission persists in 9 HDs despite good reported MDA coverage. To validate the reported coverage, an independent post-MDA survey was conducted in Tenkodogo and Fada N'Gourma HDs in September 2018. Materials & methods: The study population consisted of all persons in the visited communities. The Coverage survey sample builder (CSSB) tool was used to calculate the sample size and to conduct the random selection of households. A total of 30 villages per HD were selected. The investigators were Ministry of Education agents and health workers not involved in MDA. Data were collected on smartphones through the KoBoCollect application regarding age, sex, drug ingestion (ivermectin + albendazole), adverse events, and whether respondents understood MDA guidelines. Stata Version 14 software was used for data analysis. Results: A total of 3,741 individuals were surveyed, 53.3% were female and the median age was 14 years. Surveyed epidemiological coverage was 74% [95% CI: 72-76.1] in Fada N'Gourma and 79.1% [95% CI: 77.2-80.9] in Tenkodogo, compared to reported coverages of 82.6% and 83% respectively. Village-level coverage ranged from 32.9% to 100% in Fada N'Gourma and from 56.7% to 93.3% in Tenkodogo. In total, 99% of those treated said they had swallowed the drugs in front of the community drug distributor (CDD) and confirmed the use of dose poles. The main reasons for non-treatment were non-visitation of the compound by CDD (54%) and absences during MDA (43%). Results showed that surveyed coverage was lower than reported coverage in both HDs, yet both were above the 65% threshold recommended by WHO. However, major variations of coverage have been noted among villages. Directly observed treatment appeared to have been well respected. Discussion & conclusion: The main challenges to increase coverage will be the systematic revisiting of households with absentees and the targeting of all households in each village.

Indexed as

Elephantiasis, FilarialAdolescentAlbendazoleBurkina FasoFemaleHumansIvermectinMaleMass Drug AdministrationAlbendazoleIvermectinBurkina FasoDirectly observed treatmentFada N'GourmaHealth districtLymphatic filariasisMass treatmentPreventive chemotherapySub-Saharan AfricaTenkodogoTherapeutic coverage

Identifiers

PMID36815181
PMCPMC9940276
OpenAlexW4321611429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.