ArticleFrontiers in digital health2023
Stuck in translation: Stakeholder perspectives on impediments to responsible digital health.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Success Factors of Growth-Stage Digital Health Companies: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Developing a Music-Based Mobile Health Intervention for Parents and Staff in Neonatal Care and Beyond: Online Focus Group Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on digital biomarkers for monitoring inflammatory arthritis: insights from a qualitative study rooted in design thinking.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Early viability assessment of a Business-to-Consumer (B2C) model for digital diabetes screening in Switzerland.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- A European framework for the assessment of digital health technologies: conceptual advances, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Fostering inclusive co-creation in digital health.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- What makes clinical machine learning fair? A practical ethics framework.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Stakeholder perceptions on institutional design of digital health regulatory frameworks: insights from Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda.Oxford open digital health · 2025Article
- The implementation of digital biomarkers in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of mood disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Progress Achieved, Landmarks, and Future Concerns in Biomedical and Health Informatics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Sync fast and solve things-best practices for responsible digital health.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Mapping the ethical landscape of digital biomarkers: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Action Opportunities to Pursue Responsible Digital Care for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Qualitative Study.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Feeling safe in the context of digitalization in healthcare: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Integrating ethics in AI development: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Sustaining e-health innovations in a complex hospital environment: learning through evidence.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Wearable Technologies for Healthy Ageing: Prospects, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2024Article
- Talking Ethics Early in Health Data Public Private Partnerships.Journal of business ethics : JBE · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spurred by recent advances in machine learning and electronic hardware, digital health promises to profoundly transform medicine. At the same time, however, it raises conspicuous ethical and regulatory issues. This has led to a growing number of calls for responsible digital health. Based on stakeholder engagement methods, this paper sets out to identify core impediments hindering responsible digital health in Switzerland. We developed a participatory research methodology to access stakeholders' fragmented knowledge of digital health, engaging 46 digital health stakeholders over a period of five months (December 2020-April 2021). We identified ineffective stakeholder collaboration, lack of ethical awareness among digital health innovators, and lack of relevant regulation as core impediments to responsible digital health. The stakeholders' accounts indicate that ethical concerns may considerably slow the pace of digital health innovation - implying that responsible innovation is a core catalyst for the progress of digital health overall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.