Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36815075›Full record

ArticleCurrent health sciences journal

Classification and Grading Systems in Gastric Adenocarcinomas.

Oana Iulia Crețu, Alex Emilian Stepan, Cristiana Eugenia Simionescu, Daniela Marinescu, Mioara Desdemona Stepan

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oana Iulia CrețuPhD Student, Department of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Alex Emilian StepanDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Cristiana Eugenia SimionescuDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Daniela MarinescuDepartment of General Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Mioara Desdemona StepanDepartment of Infant Care-PediatricsNeonatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric adenocarcinomas are lesions that raise important issues in clinical practice, due to their incidence and biological behavior. Over time, various systems have been used for classifying and grading of gastric adenocarcinomas, in the hope of increasing the diagnostic accuracy. In this study we statistically analyzed 112 cases of gastric adenocarcinomas in relation to different classification and grading systems, in order to identify their efficacy and concordance in the histopathological diagnosis. The results indicated a significant association of the Lauren and World Health Organization 2019 classifications and also between these and the three-tier and two-tier grading systems, which supports their practical utility in establishing the diagnosis and assessment of the tumor aggressiveness, for the differentiated therapy.

Indexed as

degree of differentiationGastric adenocarcinomahistopathological typeLauren classificationWHO classification

Identifiers

PMID36815075
PMCPMC9940934
OpenAlexW4321610952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.