Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814954›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2022

A critical review of research into mental health consumers' perspectives on their physical health: Is there an absence of consumers in the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of this research?

Chloe R Green, Rosiel Elwyn, Nicholas Hill, Kate Johnston-Ataata, Renata Kokanović, Chris Maylea, Grace McLoughlan, Russell Roberts, Stuart D M Thomas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Eating Behaviour in Mental Health Care: An Underexplored Perspective From Dietitians and Other Clinicians.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Strengthening the Delivery of Physical Healthcare for Adults Living With Serious Mental Illness - A Qualitative Description of Patient and Family Member Perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chloe R GreenSchool of Law, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rosiel ElwynPsychology and Social Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia.
Nicholas HillSchool of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Kate Johnston-AtaataSchool of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Renata KokanovićSchool of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Chris MayleaSchool of Law, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Grace McLoughlanSchool of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Russell RobertsSchool of Business, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.
Stuart D M ThomasSchool of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a critical review, using systematic methods, of the literature examining mental health consumer perspectives on their physical and mental health in academic research published between 2005 and 2021. This review examined the inclusion, extent, type and centrality of consumer perspectives regarding their mental and physical health. The search produced 1,865 papers from which 116 met the inclusion criteria. Studies predominantly focused on consumers' individual experiences of their physical and mental health, including but not limited to their understandings and experiences of medication and associated risk factors. They also captured some social aspects of mental health consumers' physical health, including factors that impacted individual agency, stigma, and social and interpersonal factors. Structural factors affecting physical and mental health, such as accessibility of services and financial constraints, were also identified. The review revealed that in comparison to clinician perspectives, the direct representation of consumer perspectives was lacking. Similarly, while clinician and carer perspectives on structural factors were investigated, the consumer perspective in this area was missing. The review also found few genuine codesigned or coproduced research studies. To better identify and respond to the health needs as prioritized by consumers, this paper argues it is imperative that future studies prioritize codesigned and coproduced research. It is argued that a focus on "services as provided" rather than "services as received" has contributed to a lack of progress in addressing the life expectancy gap for consumers. It is recommended that journals, ethics committees and research policy organizations develop guidelines and standards to inform best practice in research on consumer perspectives and experience and to support the implementation of codesigned and/or coproduced approaches in future research. Respecting and including consumers as equal partners in the research process will lead to more meaningful insights to inform policy and practice and reduce the life expectancy gap for people living with mental health concerns.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesCaregiversHumansSocial Stigmaconsumerco-productionmental healthmental health service userphysical health

Identifiers

PMID36814954
PMCPMC9939465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.