ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Volume change rate before and after neoadjuvant systemic therapy of breast cancer is an efficacious evaluation index to predict pathological complete response.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and evaluation of clinical models based on ultrasound, serum CA153 and molecular subtype in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Predicting relative efficacy of anthracyclines and taxanes in breast cancer neoadjuvant AC-T chemotherapy using longitudinal MRI radiomic model.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is widely applied in breast cancer treatment, but individuals respond differently to the same NST regimen. It is unclear which patients should adjust their NST regimen and what such an adjustment should be, especially for patients with radiologically partial response (PR). This study aimed to identify a quantitative efficacy evaluation index to evaluate the therapeutic effect of NST. 164 patients were enrolled in this study received four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC), followed by four cycles of taxanes with trastuzumab [T(H)], if needed. Of patients with a volume change rate of EC treatment (δV1) below 0.80, more than half benefited from subsequent T(H) treatment compared with EC treatment. Importantly, for δV1 of 0.80 and higher, patients' subsequent T(H) treatment was not as efficient as previous EC treatment and they have a lower pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Across all patients, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel had a numerically higher pCR rate over other taxanes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This study showed that the volume change rate is better than the diameter change rate in monitoring the therapeutic effect of NST. Furthermore, δV1 is a good quantitative efficacy evaluation index to distinguish patients resistant to EC treatment and predict the pCR rate and guide the adjustment of individualized NST regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.