Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814783›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Analysis of Asphericity and Corneal Longitudinal Spherical Aberration of 915 Chinese Myopic Adult Eyes.

Jun Zhang, Li Zheng, Yixuan Zhang, Ke Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8259-9795
Li ZhengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yixuan ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ke WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the corneal asphericity, longitudinal spherical aberration (LSA), and related factors in Chinese myopic adult eyes. Methods: This was a retrospective study of myopic adult patients. The corneal asphericity and LSA were measured at 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 mm diameter apertures using corneal tomography. Age and refractive power were recorded for correlation analysis. Results: In total, 531 females and 384 males were included. At the above five diameter settings the corneal asphericity values (Q) of the anterior surface were -0.09±0.21, -0.14±0.16, -0.15±0.13, -0.17±0.11, and -0.20±0.11, and those of the posterior surface were 0.23±0.49, 0.06±0.29, -0.01±0.22, -0.07±0.16, and -0.08±0.15, respectively. The anterior corneal LSA values at these diameters were 0.39±0.19, 0.63±0.27, 0.97±0.36, 0.90±0.30, and 0.83±0.29 D, respectively and the whole corneal values were 0.26±0.20, 0.44±0.27, 0.70±0.36, 0.66±0.30, and 0.59±0.28 D, respectively. Corneal asphericity and peripheral LSA showed no or weak correlation with age or spherical equivalent (all Conclusion: Corneal anterior and posterior Q values in myopia patients are negatively correlated with corneal diameter. Corneal anterior and whole corneal LSA increased significantly with diameter up to 5 mm, then decreased slightly with diameter. Corneal asphericity and peripheral LSA showed very weak or no correlation with age or spherical equivalent. Clinical Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR1800015985.

Indexed as

asphericitylongitudinal spherical aberrationmyopiawavefront aberration

Identifiers

PMID36814783
PMCPMC9939669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.