ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023
Outcomes After Combined Remnant Preservation and Bone Marrow Stimulation for Acute Rotator Cuff Tears.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remnant preservation improves early prognosis in patients with rotator cuff tears: a retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- 20° Anchor Insertion Technique Toward the Subchondral Bone in Rotator Cuff Repairs for Patients With Osteoporosis Compared With the Traditional 45° Deadman Angle.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Technique Incorporating Remnant Tendon Insertion.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Stereophotogrammetry for 3-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis in Rotator Cuff Tears: An Experimental Study Assessing Correlation with Clinical Scores.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Both remnant preservation (RP) and bone marrow stimulation (BMS) enhance the healing potential of the repaired rotator cuff by improving the biological milieu of the tendon-bone interface. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and imaging outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a combined RP-BMS technique in patients with acute rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between January 2016 and June 2019, a total of 56 patients were diagnosed with acute rotator cuff tears; 29 patients underwent conventional repair (group 1), and 27 patients underwent RP-BMS (group 2). At a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, the authors compared clinical outcomes with the University of California-Los Angeles; Constant; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; and pain visual analog scale scores as well as shoulder range of motion. Tendon integrity and retear were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging according to the Sugaya classification (intact, grades 1-3; retear, grades 4-5). Between-group comparisons were conducted using the Student Results: In both groups, patients had significant preoperative to postoperative improvement on all clinical outcome measures ( Conclusion: Both surgical techniques led to satisfactory clinical outcomes, but shoulder abduction was greater after the RP-BMS technique compared with conventional repair. RP-BMS may be an alternative surgical technique to improve tendon integrity and retear rates after the repair of acute rotator cuff tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.