ArticleCureus2023
Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Recipients Over the Age of 70.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating outcomes of preemptive kidney transplant in patients over 65 using high-KDPI kidneys compared to non-preemptive recipients.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Barriers Limiting Equity in Access to Pretransplant Evaluation Among Predialysis Patients: A Cohort Study.Transplantation direct · 2025Article
- Timeline and Incidence of Infectious Complications in Older Transplant Recipients During the First Year Post-Transplantation.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients older than 70 years are the fastest-growing age group of patients requiring renal replacement therapy. This has resulted in a corresponding increase in the number of elderly transplant recipients. We hypothesized that graft survival in this population would be comparable to that seen in the literature on kidney transplant recipients under 70 years of age.
methodsThis was a retrospective, single-center review of outcomes of kidney transplant recipients aged ≥70 years. Patients were dichotomized based on whether their allograft originated from a living or deceased donor.
resultsA total of 59 recipients aged ≥70 years underwent kidney transplantation. Of these, five (8.5%) were lost to follow-up within the first year post transplant and excluded from the analysis. History of cerebrovascular accident (p = 0.003), coronary artery disease (p = 0.03), postoperative return to the operating room (p = 0.03), and readmission within one year of transplant were predictive of graft loss (p = 0.003). Overall graft survival in our cohort declined from 92.6% at one year to 53.8% at five years. Death-censored graft survival was 100% at one year and decreased to 80.8% at five years. There were no differences seen in patient, graft, or death-censored graft survival based on donor type.
conclusionsKidney transplant patients over 70 years, as seen in our cohort, had good short-term outcomes. Graft survival is similar to rates seen in younger cohorts but the decline in this rate over time is steeper in the older age group, possibly due to decreased patient survival. These findings could be validated further in larger multi-center studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.