Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814725›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2023

Transitioning from epicutaneous to oral peanut immunotherapy.

Lauren Wong, Laurie Kost, Brent Anderson, Andrew Long, Sayantani B Sindher, R Sharon Chinthrajah, William J Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren WongSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Laurie KostSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Brent AndersonSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Andrew LongSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Sayantani B SindherSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
R Sharon ChinthrajahSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
William J CollinsSean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) has been tested in clinical trials for children with peanut allergy (PA) for its safety and efficacy in inducing desensitization. Aside from peanut avoidance and symptom management, oral immunotherapy (OIT) is another option for PA patients. However, OIT can be associated with adverse events and pose safety concerns to children and their caregivers. Methods: This study assessed 27 children who successfully completed a peanut EPIT trial. 18 of them transitioned to peanut OIT with starting doses ranging from 10-600 mg of peanut protein. Our aim was to learn more about the EPIT to OIT experience through descriptive survey responses and to gather information that may support the sequential use of the two immunotherapies for safe and positive outcomes that may not be achieved by either alone. Results: Overall, children and their caregivers had less anxiety about starting OIT after having had peanut exposure through EPIT. Most children who transitioned from EPIT to OIT had no or minor symptoms initially, with symptoms lessening later in OIT. Most were also able to maintain or increase their peanut dose over time, achieving maintenance doses of 60-2,000 mg. Discussion: In comparison with current literature on OIT for PA in children, the reported symptoms appeared less severe and less prevalent in the EPIT to OIT group. However, there were 3 participants who withdrew from OIT due to the development of intolerable symptoms. This study provides initial data in support of EPIT to OIT, and larger randomized controlled trials assessing effectiveness of the two therapies together are warranted.

Indexed as

desensitizationepicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT)oral immunotherapy (OIT)peanut allergypeanut patch

Identifiers

PMID36814725
PMCPMC9939758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.