Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814702›Full record

ReviewDementia and neurocognitive disorders2023

Diagnostic Tools for Alzheimer's Disease: A Narrative Review Based on Our Own Research Experience.

So-Hee Park, Kyoung Ja Kwon, Min Young Kim, Jae-Hun Kim, Won-Jin Moon, Hui Jin Ryu, Jae Won Jang, Yeonsil Moon, K-ARPI

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dementia and neurocognitive disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

So-Hee ParkDepartment of Neurology, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-6049
Kyoung Ja KwonCenter for Geriatric Neuroscience Research, Institute of Biomedical Science and Technology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-7073
Min Young KimDepartment of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7444-6847
Jae-Hun KimDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3064-6948
Won-Jin MoonDepartment of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8925-7376
Hui Jin RyuDepartment of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0045-5799
Jae Won JangDepartment of Neurology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-530X
Yeonsil MoonDepartment of Neurology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7770-4127
K-ARPI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD), one of the most representative neurodegenerative diseases, has diverse neurobiological and pathophysiological mechanisms. Treatment strategies targeting a single mechanism have repeated faced failures because the mechanism of neuronal cell death is very complex that is not fully understood yet. Since complex mechanisms exist to explain AD, a variety of diagnostic biomarkers for diagnosing AD are required. Moreover, standardized evaluations for comprehensive diagnosis using neuropsychological, imaging, and laboratory tools are needed. In this review, we summarize the latest clinical, neuropsychological, imaging, and laboratory evaluations to diagnose patients with AD based on our own experience in conducting a prospective study.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDementiaDiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID36814702
PMCPMC9939574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.