Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814471›Full record

ArticleCritical care research and practice2023

Knowledge Regarding Mechanical Ventilation and Practice of Ventilatory Care among Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units in Selected Governmental Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.

Kedir Abdureman Hassen, Micheal Alemayehu Nemera, Andualem Wubetie Aniley, Ararso Baru Olani, Sofoniyas Getaneh Bedane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kedir Abdureman HassenDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-2250
Micheal Alemayehu NemeraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Tirunesh Beijing General Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-830X
Andualem Wubetie AnileyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4237-3967
Ararso Baru OlaniCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-3571
Sofoniyas Getaneh BedaneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Saint Peter Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4197-6670
Addis Ababa University · ETAmbo University · ETArba Minch University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a backbone and major supportive modality in intensive care units (ICUs) even though it has side effects and complications. Knowledge of nurses about mechanical ventilators and good practice of nursing care for the ventilated patient plays a crucial role in improving the effectiveness of mechanical ventilation, preventing harm, and optimizing the patient outcome. This study intended to assess the knowledge regarding MV and the practice of ventilator care among nurses working in the ICU. Method: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was conducted. All nurses working in the intensive care unit of selected governmental hospitals were included in the study. The data were collected from March 1 to 30, 2021 with structured and pretested self-administered questionnaires. The collected data were evaluated with SPSS version 26 software. The variables, which have an independent association with poor outcomes, were identified based on OR, with 95% CI and a Results: Of 146 nurses who participated in the study, 51.4% were males. About 71.4% had a BSc in nursing and 57.5% of them had training related to MV. More than half (51.4%) of nurses had poor knowledge regarding MV and the majority (58.9%) of them had poor practice in ventilatory care. The educational level (AOR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.190-22.002) was positively associated with knowledge. Likewise, the educational level (AOR 5.0 (1.011-24.971)) and work experience (AOR 4.543 (1.430-14.435)) were positively associated with the practice of nurses. Conclusions: Knowledge regarding mechanical ventilators and the practice of ventilatory care among nurses in the selected public hospitals was poor. The educational levels were found statistically associated with both the knowledge and practice of nurses. To improve nursing care offered for MV patients, upgrading the educational level of intensive care nurses plays a vital role.

Identifiers

PMID36814471
PMCPMC9940960
OpenAlexW4320481973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.