Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814462›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Congenital transmission of

Stefania Zanet, Manuela Poncina, Ezio Ferroglio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  5. Seroprevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Open veterinary journal · 2025
    Review
  7. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. First Molecular Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Serological Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefania ZanetDepartment Veterinary Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Manuela PoncinaDepartment Veterinary Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Ezio FerroglioDepartment Veterinary Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: A total of 190 fetuses (72 wild boars, 67 foxes and 51 roe deer) from 61 females were included in the study. All animals, which were either found dead or culled within selective control plans in North-western Italy, were tested, in parallel by PCR on central nervous system, skeletal muscle and kidney. Results and discussion: The efficiency of vertical transmission in the three target species was of 87.5% (95% CI 69.00-95.66).

Indexed as

Neospora caninumred foxroe deervertical transmissionwild boar

Identifiers

PMID36814462
PMCPMC9939827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.