Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36814445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

Shifts and importance of viable bacteria in treatment of DSS-induced ulcerative colitis mice with FMT.

Jinglong Liu, Hao Lin, Man Cao, Tan Lin, Aiqiang Lin, Wei Xu, Han Wang, Jianquan He, Yuantao Li, Hailing Tang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preventive Effects of Probiotic and PostbioticJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Active ingredients isolated fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Intervention with fructooligosaccharides,Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jinglong LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Hao LinCenter for Microecological Medical Technology, Xiamen Institute of Union Respiratory Health, Xiamen, China.
Man CaoCenter for Research and Development, Xiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China.
Tan LinCenter for Microecological Medical Technology, Xiamen Institute of Union Respiratory Health, Xiamen, China.
Aiqiang LinCenter for Research and Development, Xiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China.
Wei XuCenter for Microecological Medical Technology, Xiamen Institute of Union Respiratory Health, Xiamen, China.
Han WangCenter for Research and Development, Xiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China.
Jianquan HeCenter for Research and Development, Xiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China.
Yuantao LiCenter for Research and Development, Xiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China.
Hailing TangDivision of Gastroenterology, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Bangzhou ZhangCenter for Research and Development, Xiamen Treatgut Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Ulcerative colitis (UC) has become a global public health concern, and is in urgent need of novel therapies. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) targeting gut microbiota has recently been applied to the treatment of UC. Despite its recent successes, it is still largely unknown how FMT functionally modulates the gut microbiota and improves the disease. Methods: We prospectively collected fecal samples from the 40 mice (30 mice for dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced, 10 for controls), followed by Propidium monoazide treatment for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. These 30 mice were divided equally into 3 groups, which were transplanted with original donor microbiota (DO), inactivated donor microbiota (DI) and saline, respectively. Subsequently, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to analyze the viable gut bacteria of ulcerative colitis (UC) mice and histological analysis to evaluate the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) with viable microbiota. Results: We demonstrated that the community structure of viable bacteria was significantly different from fecal bacteria based on total DNA. Furthermore, the intestinal viable microbiota and colonic mucosal structure of mice were significantly changed by DSS induction. The histological analysis showed that only the mice treated with original donor microbiota group (HF) achieved a significant improvement. Compared with inactivated donor microbiota group (IF) and saline (NF), Lactobacillus and Halomonas were significantly enriched in the HF group. Conclusion: We inferred that only live bacteria from human donor reversed the histopathology and symptoms of UC in mice and altered the gut microbiota. The activity of gut microbiota in donor samples should be considered in FMT and that detailed analysis of viable microbiota is essential to understand the mechanisms by which FMT produces therapeutic effects in the future.

Indexed as

ColitisColitis, UlcerativeAnimalsBacteriaDextran SulfateFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesHumansMiceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDextran SulfateRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingDSS-induced colitisFMTPMAviable gut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID36814445
PMCPMC9939747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.